<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zoning in the Root I.</title>
	<link>http://www.montanatransit.com/discover/archives/23</link>
	<description>Public transportation can work in a state with fierce independence and long, lonesome highways.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: danielnairn</title>
		<link>http://www.montanatransit.com/discover/archives/23#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>danielnairn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.montanatransit.com/discover/archives/23#comment-14</guid>
		<description>"Land use planning and transit must go together."

I'm glad you brought this up. I hear lots of good discussions over what to do about the I-93 corridor (including your post last week) and I know that the county is undergoing this huge zoning rewrite at the same time. Do you know the extent of the coordination between these two projects? I agree with you that they are both basically approaching the same challenge from different angles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Land use planning and transit must go together.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you brought this up. I hear lots of good discussions over what to do about the I-93 corridor (including your post last week) and I know that the county is undergoing this huge zoning rewrite at the same time. Do you know the extent of the coordination between these two projects? I agree with you that they are both basically approaching the same challenge from different angles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
